Monday, December 7, 2009

Online is Just Fine!


Writing gives you time to think about what you want to say before you put pen to paper (or fingers to the keyboard). And even once it is written you can take it back. In speech, if you say something you did not want to or that was not the best sentence you ever constructed, you cannot just go back and erase it. You will probably still come off as sounding nervous or inarticulate if you try. In traditional classroom settings it is difficult for some people to put their best foot forward. Not only do you have to be in the height of fashion but you better have showered and you better smile at people and you better be ready to speak in front of tons of people if you are called on. Online classes can provide respite from the judging eyes and put people more at ease with expressing themselves, making earning an education and really being yourself much easier.

Humans are so quick to judge if they find some flaw in your appearance or behavior. As Goffman says in his essay 'The Presentation of Self', "...observers can glean clues from his conduct and appearance which allows them to apply their previous experience with individuals roughly similar to the one before them or, more important, to apply untested stereotypes to him" (Goffman 42). Even though you may have just stumbled over a few words when the professor asked you to introduce yourself, you have already made your first impression. And you are undoubtedly being judged. People tend to pick each other apart based on how they look, speak, smell, move, and interact. But these aspects are often not even the true representation of an individual. Nerves, a bad day, a broken shower, money, a medical issue and so much more can all affect the way a person appears to others. So many factors, and yet most people never even think of these. They just assume the person is a slob because they are wearing sweats, stuck up because they do not strike up a conversation, or not as good as themselves because they are not wearing the latest designer shoes. None of these actually reflects on the person’s character, values, beliefs, or ability to be a friend. These judgments that people make can greatly affect how those being judged interact in the class. They become too embarrassed, shy, afraid etc. to participate in class. In online classes many of these factors are eliminated, creating an environment that is often more conducive to learning and expressing one’s true thoughts and feelings.

While it is true that the information one shares in an online class is completely dependent on how much one would like to reveal, most people will be themselves and perhaps even more open than they would in a traditional classroom setting. James Gustafson, a professor at Northern Essex Community College, says this about communication in online courses: "Another advantage lies in discussion quality. In face-to-face classes, no matter how hard I try, there are a few students, quick of mind and articulate, who tend to dominate the limited discussion time. Online a student can think for a day if need be before chiming in - and they can enrich their input by looking at some sources and checking their facts. Even the shy can shine” (Buote 9). Those who are shy may "clam up" when they have to speak in front of groups. Being in an online class allows them to put in their two cents and also show their personality without worrying about stammering, blushing, or the impression they are making. Also, they do not have to see the physical reactions from the class, which only add discomfort. Many who are self-conscious are held back by fear at some point. Facial expressions and body language have the ability to make and break relationships. For those who are less outgoing, sometimes their lack of words may come off as snobbish or rude. While many people believe that an online class affects students’ social interaction, “Others argue that students may actually interact more online, when perhaps they're less inhibited. There's so many exciting things going on in online teaching that aren't really even possible in a face-to-face class” (Vander Velde 1B). In an online class, where you do not have dozens of eyes staring at you while you speak or judging what you are wearing, you feel more free to express yourself. Sometimes not seeing people's expressions can actually lead to better communication!

Some may worry that online courses do not provide the same level of quality that traditional courses do. But actually more data is proving that online courses are just as effective, if not more so, than face-to-face classes. “Today, thanks to the advances in technology and the stability of applications, online learning is far more interactive. To achieve the flexibility and accessibility so desired by students, most courses are provided in an asynchronous manner, allowing people to log on when they can. There are real-time instructors leading workshops/seminars/lectures as well, but interactivity is largely the result of the built-in functionality of discussion boards” (Bitti). Taking a class online makes some people think that people will miss out on interaction with classmates, which can be a valuable learning tool, but that is just not the case. Online classes have so many other benefits as well. “Learning materials can be delivered and made available quickly, easily, and at low cost. Dependence on lectures can be reduced, opening the possibility of increased collaboration among students and greater engagement with concepts and ideas. Students do more reading and writing in the online classroom than in many traditional classroom settings. Class sizes are usually small” (Crossley). Education online has begun to top traditional classes with its’ many benefits.

Humans use different parts of their brain to speak and to write. Obviously some people are better at one than another and sometimes feel more comfortable in a certain medium. An online class can help the inarticulate speaker to express themselves solely through the written word. Of course this leaves out expressions and gestures which are vital to communication... But it depends on the context of the communication. If one is having a conversation with a friend and they are animated and using facial expressions both will know the other is genuinely listening to them and enjoying the conversation too. But sometimes people are able to mask their true feelings verbally and through expressions and gestures and this can lead to false impressions. So are the expressions that we give (as in the impressions we want to portray) and the expressions that we give off (the body signals we cannot help but exude) really that different in online vs. traditional classroom settings? In other words, can an online class mask who we are anymore than we already do in face-to-face situations?

Goffman makes the point that people can shape how others perceive them. In an online class it is completely possible that someone could create a different identity than their own. If an individual wants to be seen in a different light or perhaps the truer version of themselves than they are in traditional classes, then they are able to. But the fact is that "Society is organized on the principle that any individual who possesses certain social characteristics has a moral right to expect that others value and treat him in an appropriate way. Connected with this principle is a second, namely that an individual who implicitly or explicitly signifies that he has certain social characteristics ought in fact to be what he claims he is" (Goffman 48). Therefore, individuals will generally represent their true selves when they are in an online class and people will expect that that individual is giving a true representation of themselves. Online classes have been given a bad rep for not being as good as traditional classes due to less interaction and unequal education but this is just not true. Online classes have come far in allowing students to earn a great education while still allowing them to express themselves freely. These courses allow instructors and fellow students to judge (or grade) a student on the merit of their work alone, rather than their appearance and manners.






Monday, November 30, 2009

Jade's Greatest Hits!

Your blogs are all very well written with no or few grammar errors! You bring up some great points and always have support to back up your views! There were a few citation issues in your blogs but you seemed to correct it in the laster posts! You're a great writer and I hope my feedback helps you pick a finaly essay topic! These were my favorites of your blogs! :)

Till "Divorce" Do Us Part
Such a clever title! Your title draws the reader in and clues us in to what you are about to discuss very effectively! This blog was very interesting and not just a regurgitation of the article! You had some great ideas in here, for example "Yes, infidelity is natural, but I believe that if you truly love someone, you can stop yourself from doing the dirty deed." Not only is this funny and keeps the reader entertained but it also provides an interesting idea to ponder. What are the natural chemical things that bring about infidelity? Maybe you could talk about this more if you used this as your paper! Also, what are the things about love that would make someone NOT cheat? Just some ideas that could help you expand!

Ahh, The Irony
This blog was very interesting! You seem to know a lot about music and your opinion is very present! I think with some outsides sources this could make a great paper about the music industry and how it uses sexuality to make money! Afterall, sex sells! You have really good examples that everyone would know about and these really help prove your point. Your last paragraph is so true and that is definitely ironic! I'm sure you could find outsides sources to back up your great idea!

A Material World
Your view is very evident right from the get go and I like that! I like how you took the side of materialism, proving that it is actuall a good thing for society. Your discussion of how life would be boring with out materials is very intriguing and perhaps you could delve into that further if you used this as your essay! Bringing up the bad side of materialism really works for this paper because you use it explain how materials bring happiness to holidays that may otherwise be boring with out them. If you were to use this for your final paper I know you could find some outsides sources to back this up and make your paper stronger!


Lauren's Greatest Hits!

You have some great ideas in your blogs and it would be great to exand even more on your own thoughts! Your posts were all great but these were my favorites! I hope they help in picking a final essay! I'm sure it'll be great!

A World Without His Foundation
First of all, I really like your title! Such a good one and it sets the reader up for what is presumably your topic! I thought you must have strong feelings about this topic after reading this blog. Your voice is very present and helps the reader see your point very clearly. With out the title I wouldn't have been sure of your thesis. From your first paragraph I wasn't sure whether you thought religion was important in determing a person's morals or not. Your second paragraph you go on to explain your view but if you did use this as your paper I would make it clear that you think religion is the most important factor in determing morals. In your last paragraph, you throw in that you think a person can still be good with out God, so that kind of throws the reader off since we thought you were trying to prove that goodness comes from religion. You can definitely go with both and pull of an awesome paper if you make it how religion can effect a person's goodness rather than how it determines it!

The Chemistry of Relationships
I enjoyed reading this blog a lot! I liked that you used an outside source to add more authority to the idea of chemistry. Though I was a little unsure as to what your stance was on the idea of chemistry determining true love from your intro paragraph. Then I got to your final paragraph where you said that you think there is more to choosing a mate then just chemicals. This is a great stance! If you were to expand on this for your final essay I would definitely make your thesis clear in the first paragraph. I would also research and add your own ideas about what exactly "it" is that also determines true love besides chemistry. I'm sure there is lots out there that could support your own ideas!

A "Mallcondo" Culture
This blog was really interesting, not only because I find the topic interesting but because you did a great job describing it! I loved the examples you used such as "
Or have you ever seen a girl fresh out of a bad break up go out and essentially get a whole new makeover to make herself feel better or give herself a sense of a new beginning." It's so true! You descriptions and examples help the reader understand where materialism comes from as well as relate to it with out feeling like a bad person for thinking materialism can be good. You do a good job of explaining both the good and bad sides of materialism. Perhaps if you were to use this as your final essay you could either choose one side or further expand on each side! I think you make good points about both so expanding on both would be an interesting read!

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Week 12 Blog Reviews

Ashley: Government: This blog was really good! I felt like you stated your opinion well and used evidence to back it up very effectively. Your very first sentence had a slight grammar issue and I think it could be fixed by saying "The creation of the United States..." very well written otherwise!
The World of Money: Finance is such a boring subject but you did a good job working with this essay! You summarized well and added you own ideas about areas have been affected by changes in finance. In your last paragraph there is one grammar mistake "...other types of financial transactions has increased..." It should be 'have' instead of 'has.' But other than that it looks good :)

Whitney: In A Perfect World: Great job with this post!! You explained libertarianism so well and also the views of those opposed to it. I liked how you explained the text and then added so much of your opinion. I realy liked your last paragraph and wish for a perfect world like you describe! I agree that until then government is probably necessary!
The Fascination With Finance: Your opening paragraph definitely gets the reader interested in what you are about to discuss. I like how you say finance combines our money obsession with risk. You explain finance well while keep it interesting.

Krista: The way you started this blog was very intriguing! It pulled me in. Discussing the Patriot Act was such a good idea. There were a couple grammar issues here and there but your ideas were great and you explained them well! We had very similar ideas about there needing to be a meeting point in the middle. I'm all for government with more of a lean to the left :)

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Freedom of folly?

Would humans be alright if we did not have government control like we do today? According to Sameer Parekh in Josh McHugh's essay "Politics For The Really Cool" we would be better off. He thinks the power should be in the people's hands. "There would still be a government, but it would not be the expensive welfare state we have today" (McHugh 436). Could humans actually pull it off peacefully though?

Man-kind has always tried to establish rules, boundaries, laws, some sort of order at least. We thrive on it. Some people are followers and some people are leaders. So it makes sense that we have established a government that is supposed to help us help ourselves. This sounds great right? But sometimes the government can become too involved and focuses more on the agenda of those in office then those that put them in office. This is where politics go bad...

I tend to be in the middle of the spectrum of anarchy and complete government control. Everything in moderation, as they say. Too much government control leads to unhappiness, oppression, and usually revolt. Anarchy would be utter chaos since humans truly do desire structure and stability. Parekh's ideal is "...strong on law and order, sanctity of contract and minimal social security..." (McHugh 436). This does not actually sound too bad. I think a lot of things in life have become much more complicated than they need to be and simplifying the structure of government could make things easier for everyone.

Week 11 Blog Reviews

Ashley
How Much Would You Pay for My Name On Your Chest: This was such a good blog!!! It was very interesting and had so much of your own thoughts and ideas. I think so far I vote that you use this as your unit essay! I'm sure you could find lots of outside information and more of your own ideas to extend it!
African Americans: The Immigrant Leaders: This blog was very well written too. The reader is definitely able to understand your message through out the paper and you back up your points very well. In your last paragraph you say "the Mexicans" multiple times and it sounds a little aggressive and like you are grouping them all together as nuisances. I might just change it to "Mexicans."

Whitney
I Want It All: First off, good title! Second, awesome first paragraph! Using the seven deadly sins was such a clever idea to incorporate! And I love how you use it through out your blog and not just in the first paragraph to draw readers in. I really like the direction you chose for your essay. I also thought materialism had good things about it. I agree that it is a common attribute among all peeople from all over.
The Melting Pot: You are such a good writer and even though I read Maggs' essay and attempted to write about issues relating to it, you bring such a fresh perspective/angle. I liked how you said that immigrants that were once thought to be problematic are now seen as wonderful additions to society. Good point!! The only grammar thing I noticed was you need a comma between differences and America: "If America had never given them a chance to make such differences America's history would be dramatically different."

Krista
In a Materialistic World: you have some really great ideas in this post. I like how you discuss the meaning behind the items. I agree that if consumers can learn to control themselves, materialism isn't such a bad thing. In your first paragraph you ask "If we are the hands at such creation, can it really be all bad?" When you word it that way, I want to answer with a resounding "YES" because obviously we are human, we are very fallible. I know what you mean but maybe if you changed the wording it would work better to prove your point.
Moving Forward: I liked the premise of your blog! That African Americans have made strides in history but many still remain in poverty. Your paragraph about their improvment in employment and education is well written and has good support. The only thing was that you kept switching between how they haven't progressed and how they have progressed so maybe if you could focus on one paragraph of progress and one of non progress that could make it flow better!

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Immigration and the Economy weed out the selfish people

To draw on a cliche the United States is a melting pot of ethnicities. My ancestors all come from different backgrounds. I am everything from English to Native American. Practically every ethnicity that I am, has faced persecution in some way, at some point in their lives. To focus on one, Irish immigrants during the 19th century faced particularly harsh persecution. They came to America, like so many others before and after them, to get away from poverty, starvation, and scary political/religious situations. Coming to America was a dream for them. But many Americans resented them, like they do Hispanics today. "Some Americans view immigrants as cheap and conscientious workers in a tight labor market- one in which arduous or distasteful jobs are especially hard to fill. Others see immigrants taking away jobs from American-born workers, depressing wages, and becoming a burden for federal and local governments" (Maggs 424).

When the Irish came to America, they did not face as much racism and prejudice as Hispanics or African Americans but they did deal with a fair amount. Being white made their immigration easier since they blended in more, but their different beliefs and views made them stand out. Since many Irish people are Catholic, they had to deal with prejudice against their religion. Nativists, who believed in "favoring of the interests of long-standing inhabitants of an area over those of newcomers" (u-shistory.com) were afraid that the Irish immigrants would be more loyal to the church than to the United States (Kenny). Just like so many other religious prejudices, the Irish's belief in Catholicism was targeted.

The Irish were also targeted because of their impact on the economy. People thought that they were taking all of the lower, working class jobs. Since they were willing to work for lower wages this was often true. This also caused wages to be lowered since the Irish were willing to work for so cheap. Why should businesses hire people expecting more when they could get such cheap labor? "Many Americans also feared that the Irish would never advance socially but would instead become the first permanent working class in the United States, threatening the central principle of 19th-century American life: upward social mobility through hard work" (Kenny). They feared the death of the American dream by people who came here just for the American dream.

It was not until 1960, when John F. Kennedy was elected as president, that anti-Irish feelings ended (Kenny). How sad that it took so long. But at least it shows that those feelings can be abolished. Perhaps someday Hispanics can be freely accepted and actually thanked for taking the awful, low-wage jobs, that no one really wants anyway. People are just selfish.

Clearly, there are many sides to immigration. People all deserve a happy life. Those who come to America have every right to better themselves in my opinion. But those who are already here sometimes feel that they are losing opportunities. Life is never fair or completely equal of course but it seems like we can make room for everyone and accomodate each other. The economy seems to always be at an extreme of either prosperity or devastation. Can immigrants really throw off the balance or are they just our excuse? The scapegoat for us, those who are most likely to blame.


Kenny, Kevin. "Irish Immigrants in the United States." America - Engaging the World - America.gov. 13 Feb. 2008. Web. 05 Nov. 2009. .

Nativist definition: http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1451.html#N